NewsletterStudioAdvertise
PREMIEUR
Subscribe
PREMIEUR
News
Deals
Funds
Allocators
Learn
Loading
© 2026 Premieur Group Holdings All rights reserved.
AboutSubscribeSupportPrivacyTerms
Learn / Deals and M&A / Leveraged finance and the debt stack

Leveraged finance and the debt stack

Premieur Institute · Read time: 17 minutes

The instruments that finance a buyout, from revolver to PIK, how they are priced over SOFR, how leverage and coverage are measured, how covenants work and how lenders size debt.

$

Contents

The instruments, from top to bottomPricing: SOFR plus a spread, OID and feesLeverage and coverage ratiosCovenants: maintenance, incurrence and covenant liteHow lenders size the debt

A leveraged buyout is financed by a stack of debt instruments that differ in security, ranking, tenor, pricing and the rights they give lenders. At the top sits a revolving credit facility for liquidity; below it secured term loans; below those, if the deal needs more, second lien loans, unsecured high yield bonds, mezzanine debt and payment in kind notes, each paid more because each recovers less if the business fails. The sponsor's equity sits at the bottom and takes the first loss.

The structure is a negotiation between what the sponsor wants (as much cheap, flexible debt as possible) and what lenders will provide (enough to earn a return without risking principal). The tools of that negotiation are standard: leverage multiples of EBITDA, interest coverage ratios, pricing as a spread over the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), original issue discount and fees, and covenants that are tested either every quarter or only when the borrower takes a specific action.

This topic walks down the stack instrument by instrument, explains how floating rate debt is priced, defines the leverage and coverage ratios lenders use, contrasts maintenance and incurrence covenants and covenant lite terms, builds a full capital structure table with leverage by tranche, blended cost of debt and coverage, and shows how lenders size the debt a deal can carry.

Key takeaways

  • The debt stack runs from the revolver and senior secured term loans through second lien, high yield bonds and mezzanine to PIK notes; each step down ranks behind the one above and is priced higher.
  • Floating rate loans pay SOFR plus a spread; original issue discount and upfront fees raise the lender's yield, conventionally amortised over a three year life for term loans.
  • Leverage is debt divided by EBITDA, measured cumulatively through each tranche; coverage is EBITDA divided by cash interest. In the Brennock example total leverage is 5.5x, the blended cost of debt 8.14 percent and cash interest coverage 2.52x.
  • Maintenance covenants are tested every quarter; incurrence covenants only when the borrower acts. Most broadly syndicated term loans are covenant lite, with at most a springing test on the revolver.
  • Lenders size debt by the tightest of several constraints, typically a leverage cap, a minimum interest coverage and a loan to value limit.

The instruments, from top to bottom

The revolving credit facility (revolver) is a committed line the company can draw, repay and redraw, used for working capital and liquidity. It is usually undrawn or lightly drawn at closing, pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount and is held by banks, which value it for the relationship. Term loan A is an amortising loan, also bank held, with significant annual repayments and maintenance covenants; it is now uncommon in large sponsor deals. Term loan B is the workhorse of the broadly syndicated market: a senior secured, floating rate loan sold to institutional investors such as collateralised loan obligations (CLOs), with minimal amortisation, typically 1 percent a year, and a bullet at maturity around seven years out.

Private credit funds offer a single alternative, the unitranche: one senior secured loan replacing the first and second lien layers, at one blended spread, sometimes split behind the scenes into first out and last out pieces among lenders. It costs more than a syndicated term loan B but closes faster, with certainty, confidential terms and a small group of lenders to negotiate with later. Second lien loans share the same collateral as the first lien but are paid only after it on enforcement, and are priced well above it.

High yield bonds are fixed rate, usually unsecured or secured senior notes sold to bond investors, with maturities of around eight years, call protection that makes early repayment expensive, and incurrence covenants only. Mezzanine debt is subordinated, privately placed, and often pays part cash, part PIK interest, sometimes with warrants. PIK notes, frequently issued by a holding company above the operating group, pay all interest in kind and rank structurally behind every creditor of the operating companies.

The leveraged finance stack (illustrative US market terms)
InstrumentRanking and securityRateAmortisation and tenorCovenantsTypical holders
RevolverSenior secured, first lienSOFR + spread on drawn; commitment fee on undrawnNone; about 5 yearsSpringing leverage test, or maintenanceBanks
Term loan ASenior secured, first lienSOFR + spreadMeaningful annual amortisation; about 5 yearsMaintenanceBanks
Term loan BSenior secured, first lienSOFR + spread, often with OID1 percent a year, bullet; about 7 yearsUsually covenant liteCLOs, loan funds
UnitrancheSenior secured, replaces first and second lienSOFR + a higher blended spreadLow amortisation; about 6 to 7 yearsOften one maintenance covenantPrivate credit funds
Second lienSecured, paid after first lienSOFR + a wider spreadBullet; about 8 yearsIncurrence, sometimes maintenanceCredit funds
High yield bondSenior unsecured or secured notesFixed couponBullet; about 8 years, with call protectionIncurrence onlyBond funds, insurers
MezzanineSubordinated, often unsecuredFixed, part cash and part PIK, sometimes warrantsBulletIncurrence, sometimes maintenanceMezzanine funds
HoldCo PIK noteStructurally subordinatedFixed, paid in kindBulletIncurrenceCredit funds
Terms vary with the market and the credit. Ranking and pricing move together: each instrument further down recovers less in a default and is paid more.

Pricing: SOFR plus a spread, OID and fees

Floating rate loans pay a base rate plus a fixed margin, the spread. Since the retirement of US dollar LIBOR in 2023, the base rate for US leveraged loans is Term SOFR, a forward looking rate derived from the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, usually set for one or three month interest periods. Many loans include a floor, a minimum level for the base rate, which matters only when rates are very low. Because the base rate floats, the borrower's interest bill rises and falls with policy rates, which is why sponsors commonly hedge part of the floating exposure with interest rate swaps or caps.

Lenders are also paid at the outset. Original issue discount (OID) means the loan is funded below par: a loan issued at 99 delivers $99 of cash for every $100 the borrower must repay. Arrangers charge underwriting and arrangement fees for committing to and syndicating the debt. To compare loans, market convention converts OID into an annual spread by spreading it over an assumed life, three years for term loans because most are repaid or refinanced well before maturity. A loan at SOFR + 325 issued at 99 has an all in spread of roughly SOFR + 358.

Bonds are priced differently: a fixed coupon, sold at or near par, with a yield to maturity or yield to worst that accounts for any discount and the call schedule. Their call protection, typically non callable for several years and then callable at declining premiums, is the main reason sponsors pay more for flexible loans than for bonds of similar risk.

Floating rate interest and the all in spread
Annual interest = Principal x (max(SOFR, Floor) + Spread) All in spread (approx) = Spread + (100 - Issue price) / Assumed life in years Cash proceeds = Principal x Issue price / 100
SOFR
Term SOFR for the interest period, reset at the start of each period.
Spread
The fixed margin over SOFR, quoted in basis points, for example 325 bps.
Issue price
The price at which the loan is funded, as a percentage of par; 99 means 1 point of OID.
Assumed life
Three years by convention for term loans.
The all in spread is a convention for comparing loans, not a precise yield. A full yield calculation discounts the actual expected cash flows at the issue price.

Leverage and coverage ratios

Leverage is debt divided by EBITDA. Lenders measure it cumulatively: senior secured leverage counts the first lien debt, secured leverage adds the second lien, total leverage adds everything. A tranche's attachment and detachment points, the leverage at which it starts and stops absorbing loss, tell an investor where it sits in the stack. Net leverage subtracts cash. The EBITDA used is the credit agreement's defined EBITDA, which normally includes add backs for cost savings and synergies expected but not yet realised, so covenant EBITDA can be considerably higher than reported EBITDA.

Coverage measures the ability to pay. Interest coverage is EBITDA divided by cash interest; the fixed charge coverage ratio subtracts capex and cash taxes from EBITDA and divides by cash interest plus scheduled debt repayments. PIK interest is excluded from cash interest because it is not paid, but it compounds the debt, so total leverage rises over time unless EBITDA grows faster.

Leverage and coverage
Leverage through a tranche = Cumulative debt through that tranche / EBITDA Net leverage = (Total debt - Cash) / EBITDA Interest coverage = EBITDA / Cash interest Fixed charge coverage = (EBITDA - Capex - Cash taxes) / (Cash interest + Scheduled amortisation) Blended cost of debt = Total annual interest, cash and PIK / Total funded debt
EBITDA
As defined in the credit agreement, usually LTM adjusted EBITDA including agreed add backs.
Cash interest
Interest paid in cash, including commitment fees on the undrawn revolver; PIK interest excluded.
Brennock Industrial Services: capital structure at closing (SOFR 4.00 percent; LTM adjusted EBITDA $100m; purchase EV $1,100m)
TrancheAmount ($m)PricingRateAnnual interest ($m)x EBITDACumulative x EBITDA
Revolver, $100m commitment0 drawn37.5 bps commitment fee0.375%0.3750.0x0.0x
Term loan B400SOFR + 325, OID 997.25%29.0004.0x4.0x
Second lien100SOFR + 625, OID 9810.25%10.2501.0x5.0x
HoldCo PIK note5011.0% PIK11.00%5.500 (non cash)0.5x5.5x
Total debt5508.14% blended45.1255.5x5.5x
Sponsor equity5505.5x11.0x
Blended cost of debt is $44.75m of coupon interest on the TLB, second lien and PIK note divided by $550m of funded debt; the revolver fee is excluded because nothing is drawn. Fees and OID are ignored in the equity figure for simplicity; OID reduces cash proceeds to $544m, which in practice is funded by more equity.
Worked example

Brennock Industrial Services: credit statistics at closing

  • Capital structure as in the table. Cash on balance sheet $25m. Capex $15m and cash taxes $8m a year. Term loan B amortises 1 percent a year, $4m.
  1. 1. Term loan B interest
    400 x (4.00% + 3.25%)
    $29.00m
  2. 2. Second lien interest
    100 x (4.00% + 6.25%)
    $10.25m
  3. 3. Revolver commitment fee
    100 x 0.375%
    $0.375m
  4. 4. Cash interest
    29.00 + 10.25 + 0.375
    $39.625m
  5. 5. PIK interest, accrued
    50 x 11.0%
    $5.50m
  6. 6. Blended cost of debt
    (29.00 + 10.25 + 5.50) / 550
    8.14%
  7. 7. Senior secured, secured and total leverage
    400 / 100; 500 / 100; 550 / 100
    4.0x; 5.0x; 5.5x
  8. 8. Net total leverage
    (550 - 25) / 100
    5.25x
  9. 9. Cash interest coverage
    100 / 39.625
    2.52x
  10. 10. Total interest coverage, PIK included
    100 / 45.125
    2.22x
  11. 11. Fixed charge coverage
    (100 - 15 - 8) / (39.625 + 4)
    1.77x
  12. 12. All in spread on the term loan B
    325 + 100 / 3
    SOFR + 358 bps
  13. 13. Cash interest if SOFR rises 100 bps
    39.625 + 500 x 1.00%
    $44.625m; coverage 2.24x

Brennock is financed at 5.5x total leverage with a 50 percent equity cushion, costs 8.14 percent blended, and covers its cash interest 2.52 times. A 100 basis point rise in SOFR, unhedged, takes $5.0m more cash interest and pulls coverage down to 2.24x, which is why the sponsor will hedge a large part of the $500m of floating rate debt.

Covenants: maintenance, incurrence and covenant lite

A maintenance covenant is a financial test the borrower must pass at every test date, usually each quarter, whatever it does: for example, first lien net leverage no higher than 6.0x, or interest coverage no lower than 2.0x. A breach is an event of default, which gives lenders the right to accelerate. In practice a breach leads to a negotiation: an amendment, a waiver, a higher spread and a fee, sometimes a sponsor equity cure. Maintenance covenants give lenders an early seat at the table when performance slips.

An incurrence covenant is tested only when the borrower wants to do something: borrow more, pay a dividend, make an acquisition or an investment. The borrower may take the action only if, pro forma for it, a ratio test is met or the action fits within a permitted basket. An incurrence covenant never causes a default just because EBITDA falls. High yield bonds have always worked this way.

Covenant lite loans, now the large majority of the broadly syndicated term loan B market, have no maintenance covenant for the term loan lenders. Often the only maintenance test is a springing covenant on the revolver, tested only if the revolver is drawn above a threshold, such as 35 or 40 percent of commitments. Private credit unitranche loans more often keep one maintenance covenant, set with a cushion to the sponsor's model, which is part of what direct lenders are paid for. Beyond the headline ratios, lenders now read the baskets, add back definitions and transfer provisions closely, because loose terms have let borrowers move collateral away from lenders or raise new debt ahead of them.

Covenant level from an EBITDA cushion
Covenant leverage level = Closing leverage / (1 - EBITDA cushion) EBITDA at breach = Debt / Covenant leverage level
EBITDA cushion
The percentage fall in EBITDA from the sponsor model the borrower can absorb before breaching, often 25 to 35 percent.
Debt is held constant here. In practice debt falls with amortisation and the covenant may step down over time.
Worked example

Setting a maintenance covenant on Brennock's first lien debt

  • Suppose the term loan were a unitranche with a maintenance covenant on first lien leverage. Closing first lien debt $400m, EBITDA $100m, 4.0x. Agreed cushion 30 percent.
  1. 1. Covenant level
    4.0 / (1 - 30%)
    5.71x
  2. 2. EBITDA at which the covenant breaches
    400 / 5.714
    $70.0m
  3. 3. Fall in EBITDA absorbed
    1 - 70.0 / 100
    30%

With a 5.71x first lien covenant, Brennock can lose 30 percent of its EBITDA before lenders can call a default. A tighter cushion gives lenders an earlier say; a wider one gives the sponsor room to fix problems on its own.

Maintenance and incurrence covenants compared
FeatureMaintenanceIncurrence
When testedEvery test date, usually quarterlyOnly when the borrower takes a restricted action
Breach caused by falling EBITDAYesNo; the action is simply blocked
Typical instrumentsBank loans, term loan A, many unitranche loans, springing on revolversHigh yield bonds, covenant lite term loan B
Lender leverage in a downturnHigh: amendment fees, repricing, curesLow until a payment default or maturity

How lenders size the debt

Lenders do not start from the sponsor's request. They size debt from the borrower's ability to carry it and the value beneath it, and take the lowest answer from several tests. The leverage test caps debt at a multiple of EBITDA that the market will accept for the credit, informed by sector, size, cash conversion and what comparable deals have cleared at. The coverage test caps debt so that interest, at the expected rate, leaves a minimum coverage ratio. The loan to value test caps debt as a share of enterprise value so that a meaningful equity cushion sits beneath the loan. Many lenders add a deleveraging test: the business should be able to repay a set share of its debt from free cash flow within the loan's life.

When rates are high the coverage test bites first; when rates are low and multiples high, the leverage and loan to value tests take over. A sponsor that wants more debt than these tests allow can go further down the stack, to second lien, mezzanine or a holding company PIK note, accepting a higher cost for each further turn of leverage.

Debt capacity as the tightest constraint
Leverage limit = Maximum leverage x EBITDA Coverage limit = EBITDA / Minimum coverage / Expected cash interest rate LTV limit = Maximum loan to value x Enterprise value Debt capacity = min(Leverage limit, Coverage limit, LTV limit)
Worked example

Brennock Industrial Services: how much debt can the deal carry?

  • EBITDA $100m; purchase EV $1,100m. Lender tests: total leverage no more than 5.5x; cash interest coverage at least 2.0x at an expected cash rate of 8.0 percent; loan to value no more than 50 percent.
  1. 1. Leverage limit
    5.5 x 100
    $550m
  2. 2. Interest the business can carry at 2.0x
    100 / 2.0
    $50m
  3. 3. Coverage limit
    50 / 8.0%
    $625m
  4. 4. LTV limit
    50% x 1,100
    $550m
  5. 5. Debt capacity
    min(550, 625, 550)
    $550m

Leverage and loan to value both bind at $550m, which is the structure in the table. Coverage would allow $625m today, but only $500m if the cash rate rose to 10.0 percent, so lenders also stress the coverage test at higher rates before committing.

Where this goes wrong

Errors that recur in leveraged finance

Measuring leverage on covenant EBITDA full of unrealised add backs while presenting it as if it were reported EBITDA. Leaving PIK interest out of the debt picture: it is non cash today but compounds the claim ahead of equity. Comparing a loan's spread without its OID, fees and call protection. Assuming floating rate interest stays where it is at closing. Reading the leverage covenant and not the baskets, which decide how much debt the borrower can add ahead of you.

The rule

The one-line summary

Build the stack from the top down, price each tranche as SOFR plus spread plus OID, measure cumulative leverage and cash coverage tranche by tranche, size the total by the tightest of leverage, coverage and loan to value, and read the covenants for what they let the borrower do, not only what they test.

Templates for this lesson

Included with a Premieur membership.

  • ExcelDirect lending credit memoA sponsor backed unitranche underwritten end to end: base and downside cases, pricing and lender yields, covenant headroom, recovery, debt capacity and a risk rating.Download
  • ExcelCovenant compliance trackerEight quarters of leverage, coverage and liquidity tests with capped add backs, step downs, headroom, equity cures, a compliance certificate and a six borrower portfolio monitor.Download
Go deeper with Membership →