A leveraged buyout is financed by a stack of debt instruments that differ in security, ranking, tenor, pricing and the rights they give lenders. At the top sits a revolving credit facility for liquidity; below it secured term loans; below those, if the deal needs more, second lien loans, unsecured high yield bonds, mezzanine debt and payment in kind notes, each paid more because each recovers less if the business fails. The sponsor's equity sits at the bottom and takes the first loss.
The structure is a negotiation between what the sponsor wants (as much cheap, flexible debt as possible) and what lenders will provide (enough to earn a return without risking principal). The tools of that negotiation are standard: leverage multiples of EBITDA, interest coverage ratios, pricing as a spread over the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), original issue discount and fees, and covenants that are tested either every quarter or only when the borrower takes a specific action.
This topic walks down the stack instrument by instrument, explains how floating rate debt is priced, defines the leverage and coverage ratios lenders use, contrasts maintenance and incurrence covenants and covenant lite terms, builds a full capital structure table with leverage by tranche, blended cost of debt and coverage, and shows how lenders size the debt a deal can carry.
Key takeaways
- The debt stack runs from the revolver and senior secured term loans through second lien, high yield bonds and mezzanine to PIK notes; each step down ranks behind the one above and is priced higher.
- Floating rate loans pay SOFR plus a spread; original issue discount and upfront fees raise the lender's yield, conventionally amortised over a three year life for term loans.
- Leverage is debt divided by EBITDA, measured cumulatively through each tranche; coverage is EBITDA divided by cash interest. In the Brennock example total leverage is 5.5x, the blended cost of debt 8.14 percent and cash interest coverage 2.52x.
- Maintenance covenants are tested every quarter; incurrence covenants only when the borrower acts. Most broadly syndicated term loans are covenant lite, with at most a springing test on the revolver.
- Lenders size debt by the tightest of several constraints, typically a leverage cap, a minimum interest coverage and a loan to value limit.
The instruments, from top to bottom
The revolving credit facility (revolver) is a committed line the company can draw, repay and redraw, used for working capital and liquidity. It is usually undrawn or lightly drawn at closing, pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount and is held by banks, which value it for the relationship. Term loan A is an amortising loan, also bank held, with significant annual repayments and maintenance covenants; it is now uncommon in large sponsor deals. Term loan B is the workhorse of the broadly syndicated market: a senior secured, floating rate loan sold to institutional investors such as collateralised loan obligations (CLOs), with minimal amortisation, typically 1 percent a year, and a bullet at maturity around seven years out.
Private credit funds offer a single alternative, the unitranche: one senior secured loan replacing the first and second lien layers, at one blended spread, sometimes split behind the scenes into first out and last out pieces among lenders. It costs more than a syndicated term loan B but closes faster, with certainty, confidential terms and a small group of lenders to negotiate with later. Second lien loans share the same collateral as the first lien but are paid only after it on enforcement, and are priced well above it.
High yield bonds are fixed rate, usually unsecured or secured senior notes sold to bond investors, with maturities of around eight years, call protection that makes early repayment expensive, and incurrence covenants only. Mezzanine debt is subordinated, privately placed, and often pays part cash, part PIK interest, sometimes with warrants. PIK notes, frequently issued by a holding company above the operating group, pay all interest in kind and rank structurally behind every creditor of the operating companies.
| Instrument | Ranking and security | Rate | Amortisation and tenor | Covenants | Typical holders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revolver | Senior secured, first lien | SOFR + spread on drawn; commitment fee on undrawn | None; about 5 years | Springing leverage test, or maintenance | Banks |
| Term loan A | Senior secured, first lien | SOFR + spread | Meaningful annual amortisation; about 5 years | Maintenance | Banks |
| Term loan B | Senior secured, first lien | SOFR + spread, often with OID | 1 percent a year, bullet; about 7 years | Usually covenant lite | CLOs, loan funds |
| Unitranche | Senior secured, replaces first and second lien | SOFR + a higher blended spread | Low amortisation; about 6 to 7 years | Often one maintenance covenant | Private credit funds |
| Second lien | Secured, paid after first lien | SOFR + a wider spread | Bullet; about 8 years | Incurrence, sometimes maintenance | Credit funds |
| High yield bond | Senior unsecured or secured notes | Fixed coupon | Bullet; about 8 years, with call protection | Incurrence only | Bond funds, insurers |
| Mezzanine | Subordinated, often unsecured | Fixed, part cash and part PIK, sometimes warrants | Bullet | Incurrence, sometimes maintenance | Mezzanine funds |
| HoldCo PIK note | Structurally subordinated | Fixed, paid in kind | Bullet | Incurrence | Credit funds |
Pricing: SOFR plus a spread, OID and fees
Floating rate loans pay a base rate plus a fixed margin, the spread. Since the retirement of US dollar LIBOR in 2023, the base rate for US leveraged loans is Term SOFR, a forward looking rate derived from the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, usually set for one or three month interest periods. Many loans include a floor, a minimum level for the base rate, which matters only when rates are very low. Because the base rate floats, the borrower's interest bill rises and falls with policy rates, which is why sponsors commonly hedge part of the floating exposure with interest rate swaps or caps.
Lenders are also paid at the outset. Original issue discount (OID) means the loan is funded below par: a loan issued at 99 delivers $99 of cash for every $100 the borrower must repay. Arrangers charge underwriting and arrangement fees for committing to and syndicating the debt. To compare loans, market convention converts OID into an annual spread by spreading it over an assumed life, three years for term loans because most are repaid or refinanced well before maturity. A loan at SOFR + 325 issued at 99 has an all in spread of roughly SOFR + 358.
Bonds are priced differently: a fixed coupon, sold at or near par, with a yield to maturity or yield to worst that accounts for any discount and the call schedule. Their call protection, typically non callable for several years and then callable at declining premiums, is the main reason sponsors pay more for flexible loans than for bonds of similar risk.
- SOFR
- Term SOFR for the interest period, reset at the start of each period.
- Spread
- The fixed margin over SOFR, quoted in basis points, for example 325 bps.
- Issue price
- The price at which the loan is funded, as a percentage of par; 99 means 1 point of OID.
- Assumed life
- Three years by convention for term loans.
Leverage and coverage ratios
Leverage is debt divided by EBITDA. Lenders measure it cumulatively: senior secured leverage counts the first lien debt, secured leverage adds the second lien, total leverage adds everything. A tranche's attachment and detachment points, the leverage at which it starts and stops absorbing loss, tell an investor where it sits in the stack. Net leverage subtracts cash. The EBITDA used is the credit agreement's defined EBITDA, which normally includes add backs for cost savings and synergies expected but not yet realised, so covenant EBITDA can be considerably higher than reported EBITDA.
Coverage measures the ability to pay. Interest coverage is EBITDA divided by cash interest; the fixed charge coverage ratio subtracts capex and cash taxes from EBITDA and divides by cash interest plus scheduled debt repayments. PIK interest is excluded from cash interest because it is not paid, but it compounds the debt, so total leverage rises over time unless EBITDA grows faster.
- EBITDA
- As defined in the credit agreement, usually LTM adjusted EBITDA including agreed add backs.
- Cash interest
- Interest paid in cash, including commitment fees on the undrawn revolver; PIK interest excluded.
| Tranche | Amount ($m) | Pricing | Rate | Annual interest ($m) | x EBITDA | Cumulative x EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revolver, $100m commitment | 0 drawn | 37.5 bps commitment fee | 0.375% | 0.375 | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Term loan B | 400 | SOFR + 325, OID 99 | 7.25% | 29.000 | 4.0x | 4.0x |
| Second lien | 100 | SOFR + 625, OID 98 | 10.25% | 10.250 | 1.0x | 5.0x |
| HoldCo PIK note | 50 | 11.0% PIK | 11.00% | 5.500 (non cash) | 0.5x | 5.5x |
| Total debt | 550 | 8.14% blended | 45.125 | 5.5x | 5.5x | |
| Sponsor equity | 550 | 5.5x | 11.0x |
Brennock Industrial Services: credit statistics at closing
- Capital structure as in the table. Cash on balance sheet $25m. Capex $15m and cash taxes $8m a year. Term loan B amortises 1 percent a year, $4m.
- 1. Term loan B interest400 x (4.00% + 3.25%)$29.00m
- 2. Second lien interest100 x (4.00% + 6.25%)$10.25m
- 3. Revolver commitment fee100 x 0.375%$0.375m
- 4. Cash interest29.00 + 10.25 + 0.375$39.625m
- 5. PIK interest, accrued50 x 11.0%$5.50m
- 6. Blended cost of debt(29.00 + 10.25 + 5.50) / 5508.14%
- 7. Senior secured, secured and total leverage400 / 100; 500 / 100; 550 / 1004.0x; 5.0x; 5.5x
- 8. Net total leverage(550 - 25) / 1005.25x
- 9. Cash interest coverage100 / 39.6252.52x
- 10. Total interest coverage, PIK included100 / 45.1252.22x
- 11. Fixed charge coverage(100 - 15 - 8) / (39.625 + 4)1.77x
- 12. All in spread on the term loan B325 + 100 / 3SOFR + 358 bps
- 13. Cash interest if SOFR rises 100 bps39.625 + 500 x 1.00%$44.625m; coverage 2.24x
Brennock is financed at 5.5x total leverage with a 50 percent equity cushion, costs 8.14 percent blended, and covers its cash interest 2.52 times. A 100 basis point rise in SOFR, unhedged, takes $5.0m more cash interest and pulls coverage down to 2.24x, which is why the sponsor will hedge a large part of the $500m of floating rate debt.
Covenants: maintenance, incurrence and covenant lite
A maintenance covenant is a financial test the borrower must pass at every test date, usually each quarter, whatever it does: for example, first lien net leverage no higher than 6.0x, or interest coverage no lower than 2.0x. A breach is an event of default, which gives lenders the right to accelerate. In practice a breach leads to a negotiation: an amendment, a waiver, a higher spread and a fee, sometimes a sponsor equity cure. Maintenance covenants give lenders an early seat at the table when performance slips.
An incurrence covenant is tested only when the borrower wants to do something: borrow more, pay a dividend, make an acquisition or an investment. The borrower may take the action only if, pro forma for it, a ratio test is met or the action fits within a permitted basket. An incurrence covenant never causes a default just because EBITDA falls. High yield bonds have always worked this way.
Covenant lite loans, now the large majority of the broadly syndicated term loan B market, have no maintenance covenant for the term loan lenders. Often the only maintenance test is a springing covenant on the revolver, tested only if the revolver is drawn above a threshold, such as 35 or 40 percent of commitments. Private credit unitranche loans more often keep one maintenance covenant, set with a cushion to the sponsor's model, which is part of what direct lenders are paid for. Beyond the headline ratios, lenders now read the baskets, add back definitions and transfer provisions closely, because loose terms have let borrowers move collateral away from lenders or raise new debt ahead of them.
- EBITDA cushion
- The percentage fall in EBITDA from the sponsor model the borrower can absorb before breaching, often 25 to 35 percent.
Setting a maintenance covenant on Brennock's first lien debt
- Suppose the term loan were a unitranche with a maintenance covenant on first lien leverage. Closing first lien debt $400m, EBITDA $100m, 4.0x. Agreed cushion 30 percent.
- 1. Covenant level4.0 / (1 - 30%)5.71x
- 2. EBITDA at which the covenant breaches400 / 5.714$70.0m
- 3. Fall in EBITDA absorbed1 - 70.0 / 10030%
With a 5.71x first lien covenant, Brennock can lose 30 percent of its EBITDA before lenders can call a default. A tighter cushion gives lenders an earlier say; a wider one gives the sponsor room to fix problems on its own.
| Feature | Maintenance | Incurrence |
|---|---|---|
| When tested | Every test date, usually quarterly | Only when the borrower takes a restricted action |
| Breach caused by falling EBITDA | Yes | No; the action is simply blocked |
| Typical instruments | Bank loans, term loan A, many unitranche loans, springing on revolvers | High yield bonds, covenant lite term loan B |
| Lender leverage in a downturn | High: amendment fees, repricing, cures | Low until a payment default or maturity |
How lenders size the debt
Lenders do not start from the sponsor's request. They size debt from the borrower's ability to carry it and the value beneath it, and take the lowest answer from several tests. The leverage test caps debt at a multiple of EBITDA that the market will accept for the credit, informed by sector, size, cash conversion and what comparable deals have cleared at. The coverage test caps debt so that interest, at the expected rate, leaves a minimum coverage ratio. The loan to value test caps debt as a share of enterprise value so that a meaningful equity cushion sits beneath the loan. Many lenders add a deleveraging test: the business should be able to repay a set share of its debt from free cash flow within the loan's life.
When rates are high the coverage test bites first; when rates are low and multiples high, the leverage and loan to value tests take over. A sponsor that wants more debt than these tests allow can go further down the stack, to second lien, mezzanine or a holding company PIK note, accepting a higher cost for each further turn of leverage.
Brennock Industrial Services: how much debt can the deal carry?
- EBITDA $100m; purchase EV $1,100m. Lender tests: total leverage no more than 5.5x; cash interest coverage at least 2.0x at an expected cash rate of 8.0 percent; loan to value no more than 50 percent.
- 1. Leverage limit5.5 x 100$550m
- 2. Interest the business can carry at 2.0x100 / 2.0$50m
- 3. Coverage limit50 / 8.0%$625m
- 4. LTV limit50% x 1,100$550m
- 5. Debt capacitymin(550, 625, 550)$550m
Leverage and loan to value both bind at $550m, which is the structure in the table. Coverage would allow $625m today, but only $500m if the cash rate rose to 10.0 percent, so lenders also stress the coverage test at higher rates before committing.
Templates for this lesson
Included with a Premieur membership.
- ExcelDirect lending credit memoA sponsor backed unitranche underwritten end to end: base and downside cases, pricing and lender yields, covenant headroom, recovery, debt capacity and a risk rating.Download
- ExcelCovenant compliance trackerEight quarters of leverage, coverage and liquidity tests with capped add backs, step downs, headroom, equity cures, a compliance certificate and a six borrower portfolio monitor.Download